In this thought experiment, meaning itself depends on such vanishing points: implicit centres that cannot be grasped directly, only inferred through the alignments they generate. The system coheres not because the point is present, but precisely because it is absent — a horizon of reference that guides without ever appearing.
The paradox: meaning organises itself around what cannot be construed. The absent centre gives shape to what is actualised, while itself remaining structurally inaccessible.
This pushes us to see that:
-
Every act of construal invokes a horizon that exceeds it.
-
Absence is not a lack but an organising principle.
-
The ungraspable is not outside meaning, but the condition of its form.
Philosophical stakes:
-
Is every system of meaning structured by what it cannot contain?
-
Do we misrecognise coherence as presence, when it is in fact an effect of absence?
-
Might the ‘beyond’ of meaning not be transcendence, but the very geometry of construal?
No comments:
Post a Comment