Imagine standing in a canyon and calling out your name. The sound bounces back—your voice, but not yours. You call again, and again it returns, slightly altered, softened, stretched. Each repetition is both the same and not the same, each echo drifting further from the first call.
The paradox: is the echo your voice, or something else? If you were silent, the echo would not exist. Yet once the canyon has taken your call, the voice that comes back is no longer yours—it is the canyon’s construal of your voice.
From a relational ontology, the echo is neither pure repetition nor pure invention. It is a re-cutting of the event through a different construal: your sound re-instantiated by the walls of stone, shaped into new patterns of resonance. The echo is not outside construal but a demonstration of it: each return is an alignment that both preserves and transforms.
What this reveals:
Meaning and reality are never static originals. They reverberate, shifting across construals, never reducible to a single source. The echo does not take us away from presence—it reminds us that presence itself is always perspectival, always resonating beyond itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment